ELFA Mobile

The New Lease Accounting Standard’s Impact on Lessor Product and Structuring Opportunities

Posted 08/15/2016

Note: This is the third article in a four-part series of articles featured in the QuickBrief e-newsletter designed to help ELFA members prepare for the new lease accounting rules. The new rules are scheduled to take effect for financial periods starting after Dec. 15, 2018, for public companies and after Dec. 15, 2019, for private companies. This article is excerpted from information at ELFA’s Lease Accounting webpage.

Under the new lease accounting standard, the structuring objective of both FASB and IASB lessees is to minimize the capitalized amount of leases. There are product options and structures that a lessor can employ to help meet the lessees’ objective.

Lease product options include conditional sales, fair market value (FMV) leases, synthetic leases, and for vehicles, TRAC and split TRAC leases. The “best” financial products for lowering the amount capitalized, allowing straight line expense and avoiding the lease liability classified as debt are operating leases structured as FMV leases, synthetic leases or split TRACs. The most favorable products (assuming a U.S. customer) are conditional sales and TRACs as they are finance leases and capitalized generally at 100% of cost.  For IFRS customers all products will result in the lease liability labeled as debt and front ended lease costs. The IFRS customer is still motivated to lower the present value of the rents to lower the amount of assets and liabilities capitalized to minimize the negative impacts to financial ratios and measures.

Residual guarantee products and variations may be attractive (remember a residual guarantee may eliminate tax benefits to the lessor) given that only the probable payment (not the full amount of the guarantee) under the residual guarantee is capitalized. At commencement the probable payment under the guarantee should be zero as the residual guarantee is generally structured with the strike price set at the expected future value—it is not “in the money.” A residual guarantee allows the lessor to offer a lower rent by assuming a higher residual without the asset risk, as the lessee guarantees the residual (there is credit risk; that is, can the lessee pay the guarantee if needed?).  

The following table of capitalized values for different lease structures shows that the split TRAC and synthetic leases offer the lowest capitalized values. The high residual assets offer lower capitalized values than low residual assts. Note that the PC lease with an interim rent would not be classified as an operating lease as the interim rent will be capitalized causing the present value to exceed 90% of the asset cost.  These values are not purported to represent current market pricing.

Lease Type Sample Terms Estimated Capitalized Value @ 6% disc rate
PC lease 36 mos, 2.73% pmt, FMV with 15 day interim rent 91% of cost *
Auto fleet lease 12 mos, 2.5% pmt, 76% RVG (split TRAC) 29% of cost
Construction/Ag equip lease 36 mos, 1.6% pmt, FMV, 50% residual 52% of cost
Cat Scanner lease 60 mos, 1.5% pmt, FMV, 20% residual 77% of cost
Truck lease 84 mos, 1.24% pmt, FMV 23% resid 85% of cost
Corp jet lease 120 mos, 0.65% pmt, FMV 59% of cost
RE synthetic lease 60 mos, 0.5% pmt, 85% RVG 26% of cost

 

This article is an excerpt from “Navigating the New Lease Accounting Standard.”

Disclaimer: The information in this document is a summary only and does not constitute financial advice. Readers should obtain their own independent accounting advice that takes into account all relevant aspects of a particular lessor’s or lessee’s business and products.

 

 

 

Author
Amy Vogt
Organization
ELFA