Choice of Law Clauses
Last Review
Last Update
Statutes
Only case law and common law/Restatement 2d of Conflict of Laws
Cases
"Parties to a contract in Minnesota may control the choice of law by express contractual provision. OT Indus v. Ot-tehdas Oy Santasalo-Sohlborg Ab, 346 N.W.2d 162 (Minn.App. 1984); See Medtronic Inc. v. Gibbons, 684 F.2d 565 (8th Cir. 1982); Hauenstein & Bermeister Inc. v. Met-Fab Indus., 320 N.W.2d 886 (Minn. 1982).
Parties may agree that the law of another state will govern their agreement, and the court will interpret and apply the law of the other state when such an agreement is made. Milliken & Co. v. Eagle Packaging Co., 295 N.W.2d 377 (Minn. 1980)."
Comments
None.
Contributors
Joseph Lawver
The statutory information was edited and reviewed with the support of MultiState
Become a Content Contributor
The State Law Compendium is made possible through the cooperation, dedication and ongoing efforts of attorney’s who provide and update its statues, cases and comments.
Attorneys who would like to volunteer to develop or update compendium content are welcome to contact us to learn more.